WIGGINS v. TAYLOR

No. 763SC332.

228 S.E.2d 476 (1976)

31 N.C. App. 79

Ethel M. WIGGINS and Ruby M. Cole v. Harry TAYLOR.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 6, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee, Hancock & Lasitter by C. E. Hancock, Jr., New Bern, for plaintiffs.

Beaman, Kellum, Mills & Kafer by James C. Mills, New Bern, for defendant.


BROCK, Chief Judge.

The main point of defendant's appeal is his contention that plaintiffs' evidence is not sufficient to support a finding that plaintiffs held the land in question under known and visible boundaries continuously for more than twenty years.

Plaintiffs' evidence shows that the land in question is bounded on two sides by Cahooque Creek and on a third side by Spring Branch. Clearly these three boundaries are known and visible. The fourth boundary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases