GIBSON v. CLINE

No. 7530SC836.

222 S.E.2d 478 (1976)

28 N.C. App. 657

W. V. GIBSON v. Ray CLINE and wife, Maxine Conley Cline.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 3, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert L. Hyde, Asheville, for defendants-appellants.

Francis & Hipps by W. R. Francis, Waynesville, for plaintiff-appellee.


BRITT, Judge.

Defendants contend that the order appealed from does not meet the requirements of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 65(d). This contention has merit.

G.S. 1A-1, Rule 65(d), provides in pertinent part as follows: "Every order granting an injunction and every restraining order shall set forth the reasons for its issuance; shall be specific in terms; shall describe in reasonable detail, and not by reference to the complaint or other document, the act or acts enjoined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases