Affirmed.
The issues presented at trial involved testing of the credibility of the various witnesses, and those issues were correctly resolved by the members of the jury as triers of the facts. We find that neither the prosecutor's cross-examination of the defendant nor his summation to the jury was improper. The cross-examination conducted by the prosecutor relating to a prior robbery was geared to impeachment of the credibility of the defendant. While these acts...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
