1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 238 Pa.Super.
  5. 238 Pa.Super. 456 (1976)
 

COHEN, et vir v. JENKINTOWN CAB CO., et al.

238 Pa.Super. 456 (1976)

Cohen et vir, Appellants, v. Jenkintown Cab Company et al., Appellants.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

February 5, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward R. Paul, with him LaBrum and Doak, for appellants at No. 1257 and appellees at No. 1266.

Fred Lowenschuss, with him William D. Parry, for appellants at No. 1266 and appellees at No. 1257.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN DER VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.

OPINION BY CERCONE, J., February 5, 1976:

This appeal by Jenkintown Cab Co. arises from the lower court's granting of plaintiff's motion for a new trial, after the jury returned a verdict for the defendant cab company at the trial. The principal allegation of error is that the court en banc mistakenly granted the motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial court erred in refusing to permit testimony concerning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases