Unanimously affirmed.
We do not find any error in the denial by the trial court of the defendant's motion to interpose a defense of mental disease or defect after 11 jurors had been sworn. The defense never served a written notice required by CPL 250.10 and there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court in denying defendant's motion to extend the time to serve and file such notice during trial. We have also considered the contention of defendant that the trial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
