FREEMAN v. INTALCO ALUMINUM CORP.

No. 2829-1.

15 Wn. App. 677 (1976)

552 P.2d 214

RAY P. FREEMAN, ET AL, Respondents, v. INTALCO ALUMINUM CORPORATION, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

As amended by order June 22, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lane, Powell, Moss & Miller, G. Keith Grim, Richard F. Allen, Robert R. Davis, Jr., Abbott, Lant & Fleeson, Richard Fleeson, Detels, Draper & Marinkovich, and J. Richard Crockett, for appellant.

Ferguson & Burdell, William Wesselhoeft, Christopher Kane, Pemberton & Bentley, Joseph T. Pemberton (Tooze, Kerr, Peterson, Marshall & Shenker, Arden Shenker, and William G. Sheridan, Jr., of counsel), for respondents.


[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals June 22, 1976, deleting directions that the opinion should not be published.]

SWANSON, J.

Ray P. Freeman and Helen A. Freeman sued Intalco Aluminum Corporation claiming that pollutants from Intalco's factory caused damage to their farm and to themselves. Liability was admitted, leaving the amount of damages as the sole issue to be decided by the jury. The court instructed the jury as to the measure of damages, in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases