PER CURIAM.
The trial court erred in prematurely adjudicating the merits of defendant's affirmative defense via a motion to strike as sham or as frivolous under Rules 1.140 and 1.150, F.R.C.P. The defense was legally sufficient upon its face and, as reflected, there were evident, bona fide and critical issues of fact there created (such as whether there was consideration and whether notice was given) Meadows v. Edwards,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.