1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 551 P.2d
  5. 551 P.2d 125 (1976)
 

BELL v. CITY OF CORVALLIS

551 P.2d 125 (1976)

J. Richard BELL, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. CITY OF CORVALLIS, a Municipal Corporation, and Hewlett-Packard Corporation, a California Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 21, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles J. Merten, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Merten & Saltveit, Portland.

James Eickelberg, Corvallis, argued the cause for respondent City of Corvallis. With him on the brief was Scott A. Fewel, Corvallis.

Peter L. Barnhisel, Corvallis, argued the cause for respondent Hewlett-Packard Corp. With him on the brief were Fenner & Barnhisel and John B. Fenner, Corvallis.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and THORNTON, JJ.

LANGTRY, Judge.

The plaintiff, J. Richard Bell, appeals from an adverse decision in a declaratory judgment action in which he seeks to have a contract between the City of Corvallis and the Hewlett-Packard Corporation (H-P) declared invalid. H-P has purchased a tract of land outside and near but not contiguous with the boundaries of the city with the intention of erecting thereon a large manufacturing plant. H-P expects to hire and necessarily bring into the area several...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases