STATE v. SPRAGGIN

No. State 207 (1974).

71 Wis.2d 604 (1976)

289 N.W.2d 297

STATE, Respondent, v. SPRAGGIN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided March 2, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Robert J. Ruth and Noll, Donovan, Bolgrien & Ruth of Beloit, and oral argument by Robert J. Ruth.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Michael R. Klos, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and James H. McDermott, assistant attorney general.


HANLEY, J.

The following issues are presented on appeal:

1. Was it error to admit the Zenith television and .38 caliber revolver into evidence because they were the fruits of illegal search and seizure activity?

2. Were the two items properly consolidated into one count of receiving stolen property?

3. Was it error for the trial court to admit evidence of certain other items of property found in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases