Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In our view there was no ambiguity in the contract; the trial court properly took from the jury the question as to the amount plaintiff was entitled to receive for work which it performed under the contract. We further conclude that the third-party complaint should have been dismissed as a matter of law as there was a complete failure of proof that Mr. Lettiere had actual or apparent authority to write a letter binding...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
