MATTER OF CONTESSA v. McCARTHY


40 N.Y.2d 629 (1976)

In the Matter of Gordon Contessa et al., Appellants, v. Eugene J. McCarthy et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 27, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvin L. Schweitzer, John B. Koegel, Sol R. Dunkin, Nicholas A. Clemente, Michael K. Feigenbaum and William J. Garry, New York City, for appellants.

John Carter Rice, Michael J. Cunningham and Thomas O. Kellogg, Albany, for respondents.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, JONES and COOKE concur; Judge FUCHSBERG concurs in a separate concurring memorandum; Judges GABRIELLI and WACHTLER dissent and vote to affirm in a dissenting memorandum.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed. The Election Law requires an independent nominating petition for candidates to be voted for by voters of the entire State be signed by at least 20,000 voters, 100 of whom must reside in each of one half of the congressional districts in the State. (Election Law, § 138, subd 9, par [a].) To facilitate verification of compliance with the distribution requirement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases