Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The record on this appeal indicates that respondents' acts of revoking petitioner's parole and of setting a new maximum expiration date of his sentence were in accordance with the law (see Penal Law, § 70.40, subd 3, par [a]; People ex rel. Patterson v Bockel, 270 N.Y. 76; People ex rel. Bickhofer v Lawes, 255 App Div 873; People ex rel. Mullins v Jackson, 286 App Div 938). Consequently,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.