Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
Petitioner admits in his pro se brief that the Parole Board did submit reasons for any action it took pursuant to the parole hearing held in November, 1975, as required by the order sought to be reviewed, but claims that the board's response was untimely and that the reasons given were not meaningful. The correct procedure to follow is not an appeal from the February 18 order, but a proper application to the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
