Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Appellant seeks review of the judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, which denied a writ of habeas corpus premised upon an alleged violation of his Sixth Amendment right of pro se representation. This question having been determined by prior appeal, habeas corpus is not available. (See People v Pitman [Biggins],
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.