HALE, C.J.
The defendant was convicted of possession of a Class D controlled substance (marihuana) with the intent to distribute in violation of G.L.c. 94C, § 32, and he appeals from his conviction pursuant to G.L.c. 278, §§ 33A-33G. He assigns as error the denial of his motion for a directed verdict.
The defendant argues that there was insufficient evidence to warrant the finding that he was in possession of
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.