IN RE LOGAN


71 N.J. 583 (1976)

367 A.2d 419

IN THE MATTER OF JAMES LOGAN, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 21, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John Lee Madden argued the cause for the Burlington County Ethics Committee.

Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Haines, Schulze, Wood and Tapper, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

On May 13, 1976 this court filed its opinion discharging a disciplinary order to show cause against respondent with respect to one ethical charge and reprimanding him on another. 70 N.J. 222. The second charge was identified as the Liddell matter. In that matter the court found that respondent had been responsible for a "misrepresentation to his client", which, together with "his failure to ascertain the facts and his overall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases