Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
The lease between the plaintiff and defendant, read in conjunction with the plans and specifications for the building, was not ambiguous. The interpretation of the lease was therefore a matter of law to be determined by the court (see Hartford Acc. & Ind. Co. v Wesolowski,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.