1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 422 F.Supp.
  5. 422 F.Supp. 228 (1976)
 

UNITED STATES v. UNTERMAN

No. 76 Cr. 201.

422 F.Supp. 228 (1976)

UNITED STATES of America v. Mitchell UNTERMAN, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

October 28, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Fiske, Jr., U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., New York City, for the U. S.; Robert J. Jossen, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel.

Mr. A for defendant Unterman.

OPINION

IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.

Deficiencies in the conduct of some defense counsel on the day of sentence can so acutely interfere with the functions of the sentence that they should not be received with amiable toleration. This is so in all cases—the hardened offender, the recidivist, the first offender and youth. The misapprehension of counsel in this regard often seems to be based upon a want of understanding rather than upon any conscious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases