Special Term found that 116 of the 220 signatures appearing on appellant Nolan's designating petition were invalid because of substantial material irregularities, fraud and forgery. The remaining 104 signatures on the designating petition, however, were found to be valid. Moreover, Special Term specifically found that the appellant Nolan, the candidate, had no knowledge of the forgeries, fraud or irregularities in the designating petition. On the basis of all these findings...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
