SEAWOOD INVESTORS v. GOLDSTEIN


51 A.D.2d 592 (1976)

Seawood Investors, Respondent, v. Saul D. Goldstein et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 26, 1976


Order and judgment affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals.

Plaintiff was not barred by sections 1371 and 1301 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law from suing on the guarantee in connection with the first loan merely because it had sued separately to foreclose the mortgage in connection with the second loan. The fact that the separate loans were secured by separate mortgages on the same premises is irrelevant, since...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases