1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 72 Wis.2d
  5. 72 Wis.2d 569 (1976)
 

CARLEY FORD, LINCOLN, MERCURY v. BOSQUETTE

No. 75-14.

72 Wis.2d 569 (1976)

241 N.W.2d 596

CARLEY FORD, LINCOLN, MERCURY, INC., Appellant, v. BOSQUETTE, and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 14, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by David J. Smith and O'Melia, Melby, Simon & Smith, S. C., and oral argument by David J. Smith, all of Rhinelander.

For respondent Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations the cause was argued by James L. Pflasterer, attorney, with whom on the brief was Uclair W. Brandt, chief counsel and David A. Pearson, assistant chief counsel.

WILKIE, C. J.

In this unemployment compensation case the controversy on this appeal concerns whether the six respondent-employees, Fred J. Bosquette, Roland H. Haenel, Paul R. Joki, Edmund O. Mahner, Arnold R. Mahner, and Roy W. Oelrich, originally left their employment with the appellant-employer, Carley Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Inc., because of a strike but were subsequently discharged by the employer, thus rendering them eligible for unemployment benefits subsequent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases