A factual statement as to the nature of the case is found as far as it goes in the dissent. Sufficiency of the evidence appears not to be contested. The attack is upon a claimed set of allegedly confusing instructions to the jury. It is conceded therein that "if the jury clearly understood this instruction [i.e., that defendant should be acquitted if his activity was as the procuring agent for the police officer and not as the agent of the drug supplier] the verdict could...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
