1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 349 N.E.2d
  5. 349 N.E.2d 286 (1976)
 

OVERBECK v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.

No. 2-774A156.

349 N.E.2d 286 (1976)

Karl OVERBECK, Individually, and As a Member of the Class Described in the Complaint, and On Behalf of All Members Thereof, Appellant (Plaintiff-below), v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., a New York Corporation, Appellee (Defendant-below).

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District.

Rehearing Denied July 20, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams & Williams, Covington, Karl Overbeck, Monticello, for appellant.

Ice, Miller, Donadio & Ryan, Indianapolis, Dellinger, Dellinger & McLaughlin, Monticello, for appellee.

SULLIVAN, Judge.

This case represents the latest, if not the last, consumer-oriented challenge to the legality of a revolving charge account under since-repealed general usury laws. Here plaintiff-appellant Karl Overbeck, individually and as the representative of the class of Indiana credit card customers of defendant-appellee Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears) during 1968 and 1969, seeks some $6,000,000 of allegedly usurious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases