ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE OF S. D. v. DRIVING HAWK

No. 76-1077.

534 F.2d 98 (1976)

ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE OF SOUTH DAKOTA et al., Appellants, v. Ed DRIVING HAWK et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Opinion March 5, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mario Gonzalez, Martin, S. D., made argument for appellants and filed supplemental brief (typewritten) for appellants. Russell Potter, San Francisco, Cal., was co-counsel.

Dennis H. Hill, Costello, Porter, Hill, Nelson, Hesiterkamp & Bushnell, Rapid City, S. D., made argument for appellees and filed typewritten brief for appellees.

Before GIBSON, Chief Judge, MATTHES, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

After a careful consideration of the record and of the briefs and oral argument of the parties, the court affirms the judgment of the District Court. An opinion will follow at a later date.

GIBSON, Chief Judge.

This case involves an election dispute among members of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe of South Dakota.1 Appellants, the Rosebud Sioux Tribe of South Dakota, Robert Burnette, in his official capacity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases