Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion remanded to Special Term for a hearing and a new determination on the issue of jurisdiction. No fact issues were presented on this appeal.
The resolution of the question of whether the court has jurisdiction stems from whether defendant's agent had actual or apparent authority to issue bonds outside Pennsylvania (Insurance Law, § 59-a, subds 1, 2). Plaintiffs should be given the opportunity...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
