1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 24 Pa.Commw.
  5. 24 Pa.Commw. 607 (1976)
 

REDEV. AUTH. OF PHILA. v. E. AUBURN ST.

No. 1081 C.D. 1975.

24 Pa.Commw. 607 (1976)

In the Matter of the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia, Urban Renewal Area v. Premises: 2250-52 East Auburn St., Philadelphia, Pa. Claim of: Douglas Waste Paper Company. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia, Appellant.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

May 12, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis L. Friedman, with him Peter A. Galante, for appellant.

Leon W. Silverman, with him Stein & Silverman, for appellee.

Argued April 7, 1976, before President Judge BOWMAN and Judges CRUMLISH, JR., KRAMER, WILKINSON, JR., MENCER, ROGERS and BLATT.

OPINION BY JUDGE WILKINSON, May 12, 1976:

Must a person be displaced in order to be a "displaced person" to recover damages for business dislocation in an eminent domain action? It would seem simple enough to find the answer by turning to Section 201 of the Eminent Domain Code, Act of June 22, 1964, Special Sess., P.L. 84, as amended, 26 P.S. § 1-201, and look to subparagraph (8), wherein "displaced person" is defined:

"`Displaced person' means...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases