1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 73 Wis.2d
  5. 73 Wis.2d 554 (1976)
 

CUMMINGS v. STATE

No. State 233 (1974).

73 Wis.2d 554 (1976)

243 N.W.2d 499

CUMMINGS, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 30, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Patricia M. Heim, Legal Aid Society of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Paula Lorant.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by William L. Gansner, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

DAY, J.

Plaintiff in error, Michael Cummings, was convicted after a jury trial of delivery, of a controlled substance, to wit: lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), in violation of secs. 161.41 (1) (b) and 161.14 (4) (j), Stats.1 He was sentenced to three years' imprisonment.

The principal issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in not granting a defense motion for a continuance based on the allegedly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases