HOWLAND v. BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD


143 N.J. Super. 484 (1976)

363 A.2d 913

JESSE A. HOWLAND & SONS, INC., T/A ALLIED TRANSIT MIX, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND CHARLES NOVOTNY, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD; AND THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 11, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard T. O'Connor argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Cerrato, O'Connor, Mehr & Saker, attorneys).

Mr. Ronald Berman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Warren, Goldberg & Berman, attorneys).

Before Judges FRITZ, SEIDMAN and MILMED.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRITZ, P.J.A.D.

This appeal by the Borough of Freehold from an adverse judgment following an action in lieu of prerogative writs in a zoning matter necessitates further consideration of our determination in Hill v. Eatontown Bd. of Adj., 122 N.J.Super. 156 (App. Div. 1972). A searching look at Hill is required because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases