The evidence, particularly that as to the condition of the traffic signal lights, presented questions of fact as to whether defendant McGill was negligent and as to whether plaintiff was contributorily negligent. The jury resolved those questions in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs, and there is no basis for interfering with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.