1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 226 S.E.2d
  5. 226 S.E.2d 398 (1976)
 

STATE v. CLARK

No. 762SC162.

226 S.E.2d 398 (1976)

30 N.C. App. 253

STATE of North Carolina v. Paul Monroe CLARK.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 21, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Attorney T. Lawrence Pollard, Raleigh, for the State.

Leroy Scott, Washington, for defendant-appellant.

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the finding by the court that Officer Watson was an expert in the field of analyzing vegetable matter to determine if it is marijuana and in permitting him to identify as marijuana the vegetable matter found in and outside the car. The finding of the court was based on the testimony of Officer Watson that he had been an investigating officer in 60 or 70 cases involving marijuana, so identified by chemical analysis; that he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases