HOGLIN v. NATIONWIDE MUT. INS. CO.


144 N.J. Super. 475 (1976)

366 A.2d 345

WAYNE HOGLIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 9, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward K. Zuckerman argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rosenhouse, Cutler & Zuckerman, attorneys).

Mr. Laurence M. McHeffey argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Hanlon & McHeffey, attorneys).

Before Judges LORA, CRANE and MICHELS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Wayne Hoglin appeals from a judgment of the Law Division in favor of defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. Plaintiff sought reimbursement under the Basic Personal Injury Protection Endorsement (PIP) provisions of the comprehensive automobile insurance policy issued to him by defendant for medical expenses incurred as the result of bodily injury sustained in an automobile accident.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases