1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 226 S.E.2d
  5. 226 S.E.2d 389 (1976)
 

STATE v. CHAVIS

No. 7616SC174.

226 S.E.2d 389 (1976)

30 N.C. App. 75

STATE of North Carolina v. Joseph D. CHAVIS.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 7, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Richard F. Kane, Raleigh, for the State.

L. J. Britt & Son by Luther J. Britt, Jr., and Bruce W. Higgins, Lumberton, for defendant Chavis, appellant.

PARKER, Judge.

The attorneys for defendants Chavis and Pevia have caused two separate records on appeal to be filed in this Court. There should have been but one. Rule 11(d), North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. Each counsel will be personally taxed with a portion of the costs of the unnecessary record. Rule 9(b)(5) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure; see opinion of Chief Judge Brock in State v. Patricia Ann McKenzie, Case No. 7620SC74, which is filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases