1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 226 S.E.2d
  5. 226 S.E.2d 387 (1976)
 

STATE v. COTTINGHAM

No. 7620SC80.

226 S.E.2d 387 (1976)

30 N.C. App. 67

STATE of North Carolina v. Frederick James COTTINGHAM.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 7, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. James E. Magner, Jr., Raleigh, for the State.

Pittman, Pittman & Dawkins by Donald M. Dawkins, Rockingham, for defendant-appellant.

PARKER, Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Frederick James Cottingham, from the same trial at which his co-defendants, Eugene McKenzie and Patricia Ann McKenzie, were also found guilty. Each of the three defendants appealed. Their attorneys caused three separate records on appeal to be filed in this Court. There should have been but one. Rule 11(d), North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. For the reasons stated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases