1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 223 S.E.2d
  5. 223 S.E.2d 377 (1976)
 

WHITE v. WHITE

No. 56.

223 S.E.2d 377 (1976)

289 N.C. 592

Alda T. WHITE v. Carl L. WHITE.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Riddle & Shackelford, P.A., by Robert E. Riddle and George B. Hyler, Jr., Asheville, for plaintiff-appellee.

McGuire, Wood, Erwin & Crow, by William F. Wolcott, III, Asheville, for defendant-appellant.

EXUM, Justice.

We allowed defendant's petition for further review to consider whether the decision of the Court of Appeals conflicts with our decision in Shoaf v. Shoaf, 282 N.C. 287, 192 S.E.2d 299 (1972). We are satisfied there is no such conflict. The Court of Appeals properly distinguished Shoaf. We approve not only the decision of the Court of Appeals but also the careful research...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases