The ad damnum clauses had just been increased on motion of the plaintiff in December, 1974 to $750,000. On February 28, 1975 plaintiff committed suicide. The present application for a further increase to $2,000,000 does not contain the requisite factual showing to warrant an additional drastic increase in damages (Galarza v Alcoa S. S. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RESZENSKI v. FAIRFAX ARMS CORP.
51 A.D.2d 528 (1976)
Jean A. Reszenski, Respondent, v. Fairfax Arms Corporation et al., Appellants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 27, 1976
January 27, 1976
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.