The record amply supports appellant's claim that it provided no insurance coverage for the respondent until the coverage of the primary insurance carrier was exhausted. Special Term so found but held that appellant was estopped from raising the issue of lack of coverage based upon a failure to serve a timely notice of disclaimer. We disagree. Respondent was covered by an insurance policy issued by another carrier but he failed to timely file a claim against it. Nothing appellant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
