CHILDRESS v. HEARST CORP.

No. 43659.

86 Wn.2d 486 (1976)

546 P.2d 108

TONY CHILDRESS, ET AL, Appellants, v. THE HEARST CORPORATION, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 11, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Olwell, Boyle & Hattrup, by Lee Olwell, for appellants.

Foster, Pepper & Riviera and Daniel J. Riviera, for respondents.

P. Cameron DeVore and Marshall J. Nelson, amici curiae, on behalf of Allied Daily Newspapers.


PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs (appellants), Tony and Faye Childress, appealed from a summary judgment dismissing their complaint for damages resulting from an allegedly defamatory article written by the defendant, Dick Clever, and published in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, owned and operated by the defendant, Hearst Corporation.

The trial court found that the subject matter of the article related to a matter of public importance and dismissed the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases