The sole issue raised by the relator was his presence in the demanding State at the time of the alleged crime. On this point the evidence was conflicting. The trial court believed the evidence that relator was in the demanding State. Relator has failed to sustain his burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence that he was not in the demanding State at the time. (People ex rel. Harris v Warden,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.