STATE v. SAPP


71 N.J. 476 (1976)

366 A.2d 334

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM SAPP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 20, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Philip Elberg, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. William F. Bolan, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Ms. Barbara Ann Villano, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Morgan in her dissenting opinion. 144 N.J.Super. 455 at 460.

Three members of the Court would affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.

For reversal — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD — 4.

For affirmance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases