1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 266 S.C.
  5. 266 S.C. 263 (1976)
 

STATE v. DURHAM

20178

266 S.C. 263 (1976)

222 S.E.2d 768

The STATE, Respondent, v. Michael DURHAM, Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

March 1, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Hemphill P. Pride, II and Jesse Clark of Perry and Pride, and Tom Turnipseed of Turnipseed, Rothwell and Butler, Columbia, for Appellant.

Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., Richard P. Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James C. Anders, Sol., of Columbia, for Respondent.

March 1, 1976.

Per Curiam:

The appellant, Michael Durham, was charged with possessing 52 pounds of marihuana with intent to distribute. He was tried by a jury, found guilty, and sentenced by the judge. He has appealed, alleging several errors on the part of the trial court.

The record reveals that Lt. Galvin, of the Columbia City Police Department, obtained certain information from a reliable informant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases