1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 224 S.E.2d
  5. 224 S.E.2d 298 (1976)
 

STATE v. BOOZE

No. 7510SC867.

224 S.E.2d 298 (1976)

29 N.C. App. 397

STATE of North Carolina v. Larry BOOZE.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 5, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Wilton E. Ragland, Jr., Raleigh, for the State.

George R. Barrett, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the bills of indictment are insufficient. The essentials of a valid bill of indictment have been stated as follows:

"The authorities are in unison that an indictment, whether at common law or under a statute, to be good must allege lucidly and accurately all the essential elements of the offense endeavored to be charged. The purpose of such constitutional provisions is: (1) such certainty in the statement of the accusation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases