BLAZ v. MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO.

Nos. 46132, 46133.

244 N.W.2d 277 (1976)

Ned E. BLAZ, Appellant, v. MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO., et al., Respondents. and Aleck OSTROW, Appellant, v. MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 16, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Firestone, Fink, Krawetz, Miley & Maas, William W. Fink and James P. Miley, St. Paul, for appellants.

Rider, Bennett, Egan, Johnson & Arundel, Richard J. Nygaard and William J. George, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Heard before ROGOSHESKE, MacLAUGHLIN, and MARSDEN, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.


DAVID E. MARSDEN, Justice.*

Plaintiffs, Ned E. Blaz and Aleck Ostrow, commenced separate tort actions against corporate defendant Molin Concrete Products Co. and individual defendants William Molin and Donald J. Flood, employees of the corporate defendant. At pretrial conference, their claims for relief were narrowed to false imprisonment.1 At the close of the testimony Blaz moved for a directed verdict with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases