1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 266 S.C.
  5. 266 S.C. 251 (1976)
 

STATE v. MIDDLETON

20176

266 S.C. 251 (1976)

222 S.E.2d 763

The STATE, Respondent, v. Frank MIDDLETON, Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

February 26, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Coming B. Gibbs, Jr., and Mark C. Tanenbaum, of Gibbs, Gaillard, Rowell & Tanenbaum, Charleston, for Appellant.

Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., and Joseph R. Barker, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Columbia, and Robert B. Wallace, Sol., and A. Arthur Rosenblum, Asst. Sol., of Charleston, for Respondent.

Messrs. Coming B. Gibbs, Jr., and Mark C. Tanenbaum, of Gibbs, Gaillard, Rowell & Tanenbaum, Charleston, for Appellant, in Reply.

February 26, 1976.

RHODES, Justice:

Frank Middleton appeals form his conviction of rape and armed robbery. He contends that he should be granted a new trial because of alleged trial errors. We disagree and affirm his conviction.

The following five questions are raised for our consideration:

1. Did the trial judge err in refusing to ask jurors during their voir dire examination five questions submitted by Middleton relating to whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases