1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 364 A.2d
  5. 364 A.2d 145 (1976)
 

QUEEN v. D. C. TRANSIT SYSTEM, INC.

No. 9607.

364 A.2d 145 (1976)

Sadie QUEEN, Appellant, v. D. C. TRANSIT SYSTEM, INC., Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided September 20, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold J. Sperling, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Walter R. Choroszej, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before REILLY, Chief Judge, and GALLAGHER and NEBEKER, Associate Judges.

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal in an action for personal injuries stemming from a traffic accident. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, D.C. Transit System, Inc. The principle issue is whether the gratuitous remarks of the jury foreman, made after the rending of the verdict as to Mrs. Queen, created an inconsistency requiring a new trial. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a new...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases