CLOUSER v. SHAMOKIN PACKING CO.


240 Pa.Super. 268 (1976)

Clouser, Appellant, v. Shamokin Packing Company et al.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 29, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lester L. Greevy, Jr., with him Greevy & Mitchell, for appellant.

Allen E. Ertel, submitted a brief for appellee, Shamokin Packing Company.

John H. Humphrey, with him Candor, Youngman, Gibson & Gault, for appellee, Milton Provision Company.

No appearance entered nor brief submitted for appellee, John Pacento t/d/b/a Diz's Restaurant.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN DER VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.


OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J., March 29, 1976:

Appellant contends that the trial court, in passing upon appellees' preliminary objections, improperly took judicial notice of the facts that a food processor cannot detect trichinae in raw pork, and that proper cooking of pork will destroy trichinae and render the meat fit for human consumption.

On September 7, 1974, appellant ordered a sausage breakfast at Diz's restaurant in Berwick, Pennsylvania. On November 19,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases