1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 224 S.E.2d
  5. 224 S.E.2d 276 (1976)
 

JOHNSTON v. JOHNSTON

No. 7626DC11.

224 S.E.2d 276 (1976)

29 N.C. App. 345

Robert Franklin JOHNSTON v. Mary Jane Rutland JOHNSTON.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 5, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hamel, Cannon & Hamel, P. A., by I. Manning Huske, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee.

Mraz, Aycock, Casstevens & Davis by Robert P. Hanner, II, and Nelson M. Casstevens, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant's contention that the trial court erred in holding that it had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter of this action is without merit.

G.S. 50-13.5(c)(2) provides:

"The courts of this State shall have jurisdiction to enter orders providing for the custody of a minor child when: a. The minor child resides, has his domicile, or is physically present in this State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases