NAUMENKO v. BURRELL


144 N.J. Super. 355 (1976)

365 A.2d 718

ROSALIE NAUMENKO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ROBERT J. BURRELL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 26, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lino A. DeAlmeida, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Seaman, Clark, Levine, Addy & DeAlmeida, attorneys).

Mr. Michael John Stone argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Longo & Stone, attorneys).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, SEIDMAN and HORN.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Rosalie Naumenko appeals from a judgment of no cause for action rendered against her following a trial to a jury.

The trial was comparatively brief, since it was only on the liability issue. Plaintiff was a passenger in her husband's automobile when it was at a standing position, fourth in line waiting for a traffic signal to change. While in this position defendant struck the Naumenko vehicle from the rear, allegedly inflicting personal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases