1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 142 N.J.
  5. 142 N.J. Super. 356 (1976)
 

HOLLINGER v. SHOPPERS PARADISE OF N.J., INC.

142 N.J. Super. 356 (1976)

361 A.2d 578

ERIC HOLLINGER, FRANK HOLLINGER, MONIKA HOLLINGER, HEIDE HOLLINGER, INFANTS BY THEIR GUARDIAN AD LITEM FRANK HOLLINGER, FRANK HOLLINGER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND GISELA HOLLINGER AND FRANK HOLLINGER, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. SHOPPERS PARADISE OF NEW JERSEY, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 21, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Albert L. Cohn argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Cohn & Lifland, attorneys; Mr. Daniel Crystal on the brief).

Mr. Thomas J. Osborne, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs Vaccaro, Osborne & Curran, attorneys; Mr. Charles A. Becker, Jr. on the brief).

Before Judges ALLCORN, KOLE and ARD.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the comprehensive opinion of Judge Rosenberg.

In analyzing the various approaches to the trichinosis problem it should be remembered that the cases fall into three basic categories: (1) pre-cooked pork products; (2) restaurant consumption of pork, and (3) pork products intended to be cooked by the retail purchaser before consumption. It is the last category that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases