On January 28, 1975, one year after appellant was retired from the City of Santa Monica, he filed a petition for a writ of mandate for damages, and to compel respondents to include him under, and provide him with, the benefits of resolution No. 4413. Resolution No. 4413 ratified a memorandum of understanding (hereinafter MOU) dated August 1973, executed between the City of Santa
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
REINBOLD v. CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Docket No. 48444.
63 Cal.App.3d 433 (1976)
133 Cal. Rptr. 874
EARL REINBOLD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA MONICA et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 8, 1976.
November 8, 1976.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Dolman, Wolfe & Linden, Watkin & Wolfe, Warren I. Wolfe and James M. Fischer for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Richard L. Knickerbocker, City Attorney, and Carole Heller Solomon, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
