1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 267 S.C.
  5. 267 S.C. 224 (1976)
 

BAUER v. STATE

20262

267 S.C. 224 (1976)

227 S.E.2d 195

George A. BAUER et al., Respondents, v. The STATE of South Carolina et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

July 16, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., Stephen T. Savitz, and Brian P. Gibbes, Asst. Attys. Gen., of Columbia, for Appellants (Excepting Kale in his individual capacity).

Charles W. Wofford, Esq., of Wyche, Burgess, Freeman & Parham, Greenville, for Appellant, Michael G. Kale, D.C.

D. Kenneth Baker, Esq., of Baker & Etheridge, Darlington, for Respondents.

Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., Stephen T. Savitz and Brian P. Gibbes, Asst. Attys. Gen., of Columbia, for Appellants (Excepting Kale in his individual capacity), in Reply.

Charles W. Wofford, Esq., of Wyche, Burgess, Freeman & Parham, Greenville, for Appellant, Michael G. Kale, D.C., in Reply.

July 16, 1976.

Per Curiam:

The plaintiffs (who are fifty-eight licensed and practicing chiropractors) brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment clarifying § 56-351, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1962), and requesting an injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with their practice of chiropractic.

The defendants are Annette M. Young, Judith Ehlich, Michael Kale and H.H....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases